Tom Flanagan, remember that guy who was the mastermind of the Paul Martin being soft on child porn. Well he said....
Flanagan cited the example of Stockwell Day suggesting that a lawyer by the name of Lorne Goddard, who had defended a client accused of possessing child pornography, believed the same thing as their client — “that the lawyer himself believed that it was OK to have child pornography.” Flanagan then continued, saying “But that’s actually another interesting debate or seminar: what’s wrong with child pornography — in the sense that it’s just pictures? But I’m not here to debate that today.”
Now I am going to let you the readers decide what you think about a prominent Conservative saying these type of things. Imagine the outrage the right would have if someone on the left said something like this.
So here's my question. Why am I, a "Conservative" one of the only bloggers raising alarms over Bill C-47 seeking to compel ISP's to snoop on their users?
God helps those who help themselves........................................
Post a Comment